TeAx TechnologyWir bieten anwendungsspezifische Lösungen in Hard- und Software. Tätigkeitsschwerpunkte sind insbesondere die Bereiche Embedded Systems und Remote Sensing. Die Entwicklung und Integration von Sondernutzlasten für UAVs gehört zu unseren Spezialgebieten. Die langjährige Erfahrung unserer Mitarbeiter im Bereich unbemannter Luftfahrzeuge ist ein Garant für kompetente Beratung und praxistaugliche Lösungen. Aber auch bei allgemeinen Entwicklungs- und Integrationsaufgaben im Bereich PC-Software und Embedded Systems überzeugt TeAx Technology durch maßgeschneiderte Lösungen und individuelle Beratung. NewsNeue Produktwebseite für ThermalCapture FLIR berichtet über ThermalCapture Direktes Speichern von RAW Daten aus FLIR Kamera Modulen auf einem USB-StickComparison between Google Earth kml data and RTK data on a flight planning simulated to the Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Microdrone MD4-1000 Comparison between Google Earth kml data and RTK data on a flight planning simulated to the Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Microdrone MD4-1000

Antoninho João Pegoraro1, Marcelo Costa Napoleão2, Jürgen Wilhelm Philips3 Abstract: The unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and the use of graphical data files, of extension kml, have become popular nowadays. The kml files are associated to the Google Earth applications. Developed by Microdrone company for planning, overflight simulation and data flight analysis, the program mdCockpit was used in this experiment. The UAV Microdrone’s flight path was programmed in two ways: using georeferenced images from Google Earth and entering points coordinates into the program. These points have had their geographical decimal coordinates collected by GPS (RTK) method. The aim here is to describe a way of evaluating the difference between the alternatives of flight planning. A flight path, defined a route with 22 points, was also simulated in the program mdCockpit. The points were collected and saved, while the images captured by the program went automatically forming a georeferenced mosaic.

A comparison between the difference of coordinates to each point was made by choosing on the images and also by a RTK positioning. The result was up to 14.20 m to a 100 meters flight height. There is a significant change of position and this can result in unwanted over flights in locations or even jeopardizing the safety of air activity.parrot ar drone auckland Keywords: simulation flight path, md4-1000, kml data, RTK dataparrot ar drone quadricopter brookstone Highlights No upcoming events availableparrot ar drone sito ufficialeThey've been used by the United States military and armed forces around the world to rain destruction on our enemies from afar and are controlled by pilots in a windowless, air-conditioned, video-game-like room at a military base in Nevada.parrot ar drone ultrasound emergency

Those aren't the drones we're talking about here, and while remotely flying a multimillion-dollar aircraft with missiles on it may be every little kid's dream, you can have just as much fun with a very useful, much less expensive system. These drones-or unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) as we'll call them-are being adopted by realtors, filmmakers, farmers, and hobbyists alike. parrot ar drone too much angle emergencyThey're also being used successfully by many fire departments, search and rescue teams, and law enforcement agencies, and they just may save a life.ar drone 2 landing gear zip tie mod An increasing number of private citizens are showing up during emergencies with their drones, and it's important to understand how the technology works, where UAVs may be useful to you as an incident commander (IC), and when they can do more harm than good.

The potential uses for UAVs in the fire service are numerous, including active fire surveillance, thermal imaging, hazmat response, traffic and crowd oversight, public relations and marketing, and coverage of special events. Take the case of a standard house fire. The first engine on scene rolls up on a two-story dwelling with smoke pouring out of the attic vents and no visible flames. Step 1 is the scene size-up, where one or more firefighters take the time to walk around the structure and assess the fire from each side. They report back to the IC, and the fire suppression portion of the event begins. But, what if all four sides aren't visible? What if your agency is a volunteer agency, and there's only one firefighter on the first-in vehicle? When seconds count, critical resources are being used to size up a scene before taking any action.The first responding firefighter takes 30 seconds to get the aircraft up and running; puts it into the air; and, from the command vehicle, has a live view of all four sides of the structure.

Additional responding companies can use those real-time images to plan the attack, see the best places to park the apparatus, keep track of responding personnel, see active fire hot spots, and potentially even see victims hanging out of open windows or on balconies. Although setting up the UAV may take as much time as the initial scene size-up, the amount of information gathered is significantly higher. The benefits of UAVs are multiplied even more in a high-rise fire, where it may take crews several minutes to size up a fire on the 10th floor, or in a hazmat situation, where specialized teams and gear need to be brought in before anybody knows what's really happening at the site. It's also important to consider when flying a UAV may not be appropriate. Strong winds and rain may make flying difficult, and you should never fly within an area where you may encounter low-flying commercial or private air traffic. Flying too close to strong thermal updrafts around a fire could damage your equipment permanently, and personnel should avoid flying low over large crowds.

As the market for UAVs grows, so does the number of companies making them. By far, the most popular is China-based manufacturer DJI, and its most popular model is the Phantom. The Phantom comes in different forms: the original Phantom; the Phantom 2+, which come without cameras attached; and the Phantom Vision 2+, which includes a proprietary camera. Out of the box, the Phantom Vision 2+ is the easiest of the lineup to use and comes with the most advanced features. The Vision 2+ boasts a 1,080-pixel video camera, which takes 14-megapixel stills and lives on a three-axis, image-stabilizing gimbal. The Vision 2+ transmits live video signals back to a smartphone or tablet over a self-contained, long-range WiFi signal and will fly in up to 25 mile-per-hour winds. It features a ½-mile flight range from the flight controller and, in the right conditions, can fly as high as a ¼ mile. Each flight battery lasts about 25 minutes and takes just over an hour to recharge.

There are dozens of other options on the market, and each has a robust set of features, but price, ease of use, and certain tradeoffs make them less appealing for the masses. The MicroDrone MD4-1000 features a significantly longer flying time than the Phantom, clocking in at up 88 minutes in the air. The MicroDrone gives users the ability to do both thermal and daylight video and switch them on the fly. The Aeryon Scout is another viable option for public safety and features a 10x optical zoom camera and the ability to do both daylight and IR as well. There are also several fixed-wing UAVs that could be useful for long-range surveillance flights and tethered options, which can be suitable for long-duration crowd or construction-site surveillance. One of the clearest concerns for most people about UAVs is whether or not it's legal to fly them. The answer, however, is significantly less clear. In an effort to simplify a very complicated answer, it's worthwhile to break down the legal aspects into three distinct categories: hobby use, commercial use, and public-sector use.

As it stands today, there are currently no federal laws banning the use of UAVs for hobbyists, although a 1981 set of guidelines for using model aircraft is often cited as the most applicable set of rules for this group. These include flying at a maximum altitude of 400 feet and restricting operations to areas without buildings or heavy air traffic. But, these guidelines were just that-a guide-and aren't considered enforceable by law. Although the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has stated that UAVs are illegal for use by any commercial entities, it's not clear whether any current rules prohibit UAV use for this purpose. Two high-profile court cases, Huerta v. Pirker and Texas EquuSearch Mounted Search and Recovery Team v. FAA, have muddied the waters even further. In the Pirker case, the FAA assessed aerial videographer Raphael Pirker a $10,000 fine after he was hired to shoot aerial video of the University of Virginia. However, the basis for the fine was not Pirker's use of the UAV or for his operation of the UAV for commercial purposes.

Rather, the FAA cited him for reckless flying. Ultimately, an administrative law judge for the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) overturned the fine on the grounds that the FAA had no legal standing to impose the fine in the first place. Similarly in the Texas EquuSearch (TES) case, the nonprofit organization was using UAVs to search for missing children, and the FAA sent the group a cease-and-desist letter. TES appealed the ruling, and a federal appeals court judge held that because TES was not receiving any compensation for its services, the very nature of banning its activities as "commercial use of a drone" was a nonstarter. The picture is somewhat clearer for public-sector agencies, where a formalized approval process for using UAVs is in place. The process involves obtaining a Certificate of Authorization, or COA, as a specific exemption to what the FAA says is an outright ban on UAVs. The COA process can be a lengthy one and requires public safety agencies to identify specific pilots, flight plans, type of aircraft, criteria for operation, standard operating procedures, and emergency recovery procedures.

It also requires that designated pilots complete FAA private-pilot ground school training-like a manned aircraft pilot would do-and obtain an FAA Class III medical certificate by getting a physical exam with a certified aviation medical examiner. In addition, the COA process requires that applicants purchase their aircraft before going through the process and log training hours in a controlled setting before getting approval to fly during emergency operations. COAs are valid for a two-year period and need to be renewed. Currently, 17 states have enacted a total of 20 laws addressing UAVs, and legislation has been proposed in a total of 30 states. The majority of these state laws focus on privacy issues, which can arise from law enforcement use of UAVs for surveillance, trespassing, and weaponizing drones. There are no state laws that explicitly restrict using UAVs for fire prevention or suppression purposes, and many states with legal limitations on UAVs have exclusions for search and rescue operations.