- 10 months 14 days ago Medals are basically XP Bonuses in Multiplayer. They are awarded alongside a small amount of Experience Points every time the condition is met. The table below will list all medals in alphabetical order. At this time, it is far from complete. Feel free to add those you earn, but please stick to the format.in bikes & ride-ons Action FiguresVideo GamesBikes & Ride-onsElectronicsBuilding SetsLearningGames & PuzzlesOutdoor PlayVehicles, Hobby & R/CPretend PlayArts & CraftsPreschoolMusical InstrumentsStuffed AnimalsCooking for Kids Hot WheelsMinecraftLEGOStar WarsTransformersTeenage Mutant Ninja Turtles DollsArts & CraftsBath, Beauty & AccessoriesPretend PlayBikes & Ride-onsElectronicsBuilding SetsOutdoor PlayLearningPreschoolGames & PuzzlesMusical InstrumentsStuffed AnimalsVideo GamesCooking for Kids Disney FrozenBarbieDisney PrincessMy Little PonyMonster HighDoc McStuffinsTop 5 Syma RC Quadcopter Drone image symatoyEnjoy your free timeSYMA X5HW Utilises the 4-axis structure,enabling the aircraft to be even more flexible,speedy,and possessing arelatively stronger wind-withstanding capability.

Also it can conduct flights...Read More about Top 5 Syma RC Quadcopter DroneResearchers at the University of Texas at Austin hacked and hijacked a drone in front of the dismayed Department of Homeland Security officials who had dared them $1,000 to do it. According to exclusive coverage of the event from Fox News, the researchers flew the small surveillance drone over the Austin stadium last Monday. The drone followed a series of GPS waypoints programmed into its flight computer in what initially looked like a routine flight. At one point, the drone veered off course from its intended flight path. It banked hard to the right, “streaking” toward the south, before it turned to hurtle at the ground in what looked like imminent drone suicide, according to Fox’s description. A safety pilot radioed the drone – which was owned by the university, according to Reuters – and forced it to pull up just a few feet before it would have crashed into the field. The demonstration of the near-disaster, led by Professor Todd Humphreys and his team at the UTA’s Radionavigation Laboratory, points to a “gaping hole” in the US’s plan to open US airspace to thousands of drones, Fox noted: namely, drones can be turned into weapons, given the right equipment.

The researchers managed to hack the drone with a spoofer they put together with about $1,000 worth of parts. The Department of Homeland Security traditionally has been concerned with GPS jammers – the method of interference that some believe Iran used to bring down a US spy drone in December.ar drone battery adapter But others, including an anonymous Iranian engineer quoted by the Christian Science Monitor, say that Iran actually used the same spoofing technique that the Texas researchers demonstrated.macdev drone dx exportfeder Spoofing allows a hacker to take control of a GPS-guided drone and force it to do whatever the attacker commands.parrot ar drone orlando According to the Christian Science Monitor, this is how the engineer described the Iranians’ use of spoofing:where can i buy drones wholesale

The 'spoofing' technique that the Iranians used - which took into account precise landing altitudes, as well as latitudinal and longitudinal data - made the drone 'land on its own where we wanted it to, without having to crack the remote-control signals and communications' from the US control center, says the engineer.best drone for real estate photography Spoofing involves mimicking the signals of the drone’s global positioning device and eventually taking it over completely by sending stronger signals than the unmanned aerial vehicle’s (UAV’s) legitimate commands.how much does a phantom drone cost Humphreys claims that the $1,000 spoofer he and his team rigged up to hack the university’s drone last Monday is the most advanced one ever built. He also says that the implications of a UAV’s vulnerability to this type of spoofing are serious.

Here’s how he described the potential scenario to Fox News: In 5 or 10 years you have 30,000 drones in the airspace... Each one of these could be a potential missile used against us. Meanwhile, the Pentagon and drone manufacturers in February pressured Congress to order the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to cook up rules that allow government and commercial use of drones in the US by 2015 – an idea that raises serious privacy concerns, with the prospect of police drones keeping watch on citizens already a reality. Should we trust the US government to darken the skies above us with surveillance UAVs? On privacy grounds it seems an obvious “No”, and apparently not on “make sure those things aren’t aimed at our heads” grounds either. DHS is attempting to identify and mitigate GPS interference through its new 'Patriot Watch' and 'Patriot Shield' programs, but the effort is poorly funded, still in its infancy, and is mostly geared toward finding people using jammers, not spoofers.

The potential consequences of GPS spoofing are nothing short of chilling. Humphreys warns that a terrorist group could match his technology, and in crowded U.S. airspace, cause havoc. "I'm worried about them crashing into other planes," he told Fox News. "I'm worried about them crashing into buildings. We could get collisions in the air and there could be loss of life, so we want to prevent this and get out in front of the problem." We’re being protected from these chilling scenarios by “poorly funded” programs that are “still in their infancy”? I don’t have much faith in Congress standing up to the Pentagon and drone manufacturers, so Mr. Humphreys and your team, thanks for getting in front of the problem. Let’s hope the DHS joins you, preferably before we’ve got hackable juggernauts flying over us. Drone and UAV images, courtesy of Shutterstock.In 2005, I was embedded as an independent journalist with a platoon of Marines with an attachment of Afghan security forces in the Hindu Kush, just a few miles from the Pakistani border.

I was about to step into a possible death trap, and I’d never felt more scared in my life. “There are 50 Taliban massed behind that ridge,” said “Sultan,” our Afghan interpreter (his real name is being withheld for security reasons). He had picked up chatter from his hand-held radio. “They know we’re here,” he continued, “and that we have to cross that field.” “Time to get moving,” a nearby Marine said. We began to move, navigating the terraces on the outskirts of a small village. An hour later, we regrouped by a mosque. we later learned that the “chatter” was one person transmitting fake orders to fake fighters—a common ploy to confuse U.S. and coalition troops. Back at the Marines’ base, I asked about UAVs (unmanned aerial vehicles) the Marines could have used for reconnaissance in that situation to confirm the warning, had fighters actually been gathering to attack. “Yes, we have them,” said First Lieutenant Patrick Kinser, the platoon commander.

“Never use them, though. They often end up being recovery operations—sometimes dangerous recovery ops.” Kinser was talking about the two Dragon Eye UAVs that his platoon had been given—and had to chase down a number of times in the steep mountains around the base, after they crashed. “And the image quality is terrible.” Kinser said that even the slightest mountain winds made the UAVs’ video feed too jerky to identify much of anything on the ground. “Can’t make out anything of use, really,” he continued. “I once joked we should just fly them both into a tree, so we’d never again have to chase them down.” The Dragon Eye, while slightly larger than a truly “backpackable” UAV, was also cumbersome to launch: Either it required a bungee cord, or one of the grunts had to throw it hard while running, exposing himself to potential enemy fire. Five years after my experience in Afghanistan, I visited the Marine Corps Mountain Warfare Training Center in California’s Sierra Nevada mountains.

I wanted to know if the instructors had any experience with a small UAV that was capable of enduring mountain and desert flight. They had not, although they mentioned the Dragon Eye, and the related RQ-11 Raven, but noted that neither was compact enough to be backpackable. They had hopes for micro air vehicles that they’d read about, but most were fixed-wing. “Think of urban fighting,” said Sergeant Tony Powers, one of the instructors and a Marine scout sniper. “That’s when a squad could really use a micro UAV to get eyes on an enemy position. But a fixed-wing platform flies too fast, and isn’t maneuverable in those tight confines.” According to Powers, the most useful platform for such situations is one that can move in any direction, quickly or slowly, then go into a hover and pass video feed back to the user—perhaps a micro-helicopter UAV. So began my UAV project. Like aircraft homebuilders whose requirements couldn’t quite be met by the kits or plans on the market, I wanted to construct a UAV optimized for a set of tasks that my experience with the Marines suggested.

Here are the steps I took to create the Kestrel-6, named after the bird of prey, known for its hovering ability. (The “6” came from the atomic number of carbon and the number of motors used on the craft.) The entire project cost roughly $3,500. Step 1: Age-old aviation question: Speed or loiter capability? I chose a multi-rotor aircraft over a fixed-wing or helicopter because I wanted to be able to get a static view. Multi-rotor aircraft are also fast, very stable, and able to launch vertically in the tightest of confines—even inside a room and out a window. Multi-rotors typically use anything from three motor-propeller assemblies to eight, mounted at the end of arms that are centrally interconnected. I chose the “Y6” configuration, composed of three motor-mount arms with two co-axially mounted motor-propeller assemblies at the end of each arm. With two motors per thrust point (one facing up as a “tractor,” and one down as a “pusher”), the Y6 has redundancy.