10 DronesDrones GadgetsDrone UavNew GadgetsPhantom 4 DroneThe PhantomMarissa GoodwinOto JedenSooooo HighForwardTake journalism and drone racing to a new level. @comparaboo Plus de découvertes sur Drone Trend.fr #drone #uav #robotThe lives of British soldiers in the Brigade Reconnaissance Force just got a little safer. Rather than having to undertake the dangerous task of checking for ambushes, investigating potential enemy positions themselves ("Go see if there are a bunch of guys with guns in that house"), or just sticking their head around the corner, they can now send this fist-sized spy 'copters to scout for danger ahead instead. Dubbed the Black Hornet Nano Unmanned Aircraft System by its designer, Prox Dynamics of Norway, this micro-UAV measures 4 inches long and 1 inch tall with a 4-inch rotor span. It weighs just 16 grams, flies nearly silently, and is colored to match and blend in with the grey mud buildings of Afghan villages. The Black Hornet's payload consists of a single tiny camera that delivers both full motion video and still images back to the recon soldier's hand-held terminal up to 1000 meters away.

And while it may look like a child's toy, the Black Hornet has been ruggedized to handle the harsh, hot, and windy environments in which it operates.It's powered by a small battery pack, which imparts a top speed of 10 m/s and maximum flight time of about 25 minutes. That's plenty of time to sneak into enemy territory, capture some images, and return to base. parrot ar drone orlandoIn addition to operating under the direct control of a pilot, the Black Hornet can also be deployed autonomously using its on-board GPS receiver.macdev drone dx oled board British troops have been using the Black Hornet in Afghanistan since August of 2012 and have been thoroughly impressed so far. macdev drone dx erfahrung

As Major Adam Foden explained to UAS Vision: Black Hornet is a game-changing piece of kit. Previously we would have sent soldiers forward to see if there were any enemy fighters hiding inside a set of buildings. Now we are deploying Black Hornet to look inside compounds and to clear a route through enemy-held spaces.It has worked very well and the pictures it delivers back to the monitor are really clear. mini drone camera kopenAnd Black Hornet is so small and quiet that the locals can't see or hear it.black ops 2 maxis drone partsSergeant Christopher Petherbridge, of the Brigade Reconnaissance Force in Afghanistan, added that the "Black Hornet is definitely adding value, especially considering the light weight nature of it. black ops 2 activer drone

We used it to look for insurgent firing points and check out exposed areas of the ground before crossing which is a real asset. It is very easy to operate and offers amazing capability to the guys on the ground."They've been so popular with troops that the UK Ministry of Defense has already placed a £20 million ($31.3 million) order for 160 units to complement the 300 or so other UAVs it currently operates in the region. [UAS Vision 1, 2 - Prox Dynamics - BBC - MoD - Wikipedia - Image: MoD]All Things CoolTech ThingsDrone WeighsThat S TinyHornet NanoRecon MissionsWeighs HalfBlack HornetNano DroneForwardBlack Hornet Nano Drone Weighs Half an Ounce, is Used by Military for Recon…Skip to content‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big warHard-Hitting News and Conservative CommentaryBe the first to knowNo thanks Drone strikes targeting individuals from thousands of metres up in the sky are no longer something from Homeland.In fact the TV drama's depiction of "remote war" has been pretty accurate for some time.

Hundreds of suspected militants - from Afghanistan to Yemen - have been killed over the last six years by US drones.Now the UK government has revealed two British men have been killed by a Royal Air Force (RAF) drone in Syria in an act of "self defence".Here is your Newsbeat guide to drone war. Military bosses don't like you calling their pilotless aircraft drones.They prefer unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) or remotely piloted air system (RPAS) - also known as a Reaper.Most agree they are the future of warfare. It seems they have fast become the present of warfare.Britain's drone operations have been quietly getting bigger for several years.RAF Waddington in Lincolnshire is the UK's "drone HQ".From here, unmanned aircraft based in Iraq, Afghanistan - and now Syria - are remotely controlled on screens with "mission intelligence co-ordinators" working on the ground."From the moment I begin preparation with the squadron for a sortie, deployment of a military unit, in my mind I am in Afghanistan," said a Reaper pilot at Waddington.Reapers can carry Hellfire missiles and large laser-guided bombs.

The UK has more than 600 drones overall. In the UK, drone operators must be qualified to the same standard as the pilot of a manned aircraft. British pilots now have their own badge, bearing the same "wings" given to pilots of conventional aircraft.In the US, drone pilots may have never flown a real plane. But the Homeland-style myth that they go into battle wielding joysticks is wrong. They use a simple computer mouse. Until now, Britain's primary drone role has been to act as the "eyes" of the military. Reconnaissance is the act of gaining information about an enemy. This might involve remotely flying low over suspected militants or sites where they might be hiding, capturing pictures and feeding data back to ground troops or sharing it with allies like the US, who in turn may send in killer drones.Read more: Inside Britain's military drone base at RAF WaddingtonThe Ministry of Defence (MoD) states that: "RAF Tornado GR4 and Reaper aircraft continue to fly daily armed reconnaissance missions, using their advanced surveillance capabilities to gather intelligence on ISIL activity in northern and western Iraq, and to strike appropriate targets as they are identified."

These missions are well known and in the past Britain has helped US drone pilots target many militants in Iraq and Taliban chiefs in Afghanistan. The drone became known as Barack Obama's favourite weapon in the years after George W Bush's presidency.Using unmanned aircraft avoided putting "boots on the ground" in places where the US was not officially engaged in war. British military chiefs are fairly secretive about the UK's input but have recently become more open about the use of drones in the fight against so-called Islamic State.The MoD now regularly puts out images, like those above, to show us how the Reaper drone is assisting Iraqi forces. Reyaad Khan was killed in a US drone strike at the end of August along with 26-year-old fellow Briton Ruhul Amin. They were both travelling in the same vehicle in the Raqqa area of Syria, from where Islamic State chiefs control the extremist network.On Monday, David Cameron announced that 21-year-old Khan was targeted and killed by one of the RAF's unmanned aerial vehicles.

So was it legal to fire on these two men from a drone?The PM said they were "terrorists who'd been planning a series of attacks" and that the strike was an act of British self defence with a "clear legal basis".Critics point out that the UK is not at war with Syria and that every nation has the right to defend itself. In 2013 the government famously lost an MPs' vote on whether to join any US-led air strikes against President Assad.That effectively ruled out UK troops and aircraft in any operations in Syria.But since then Islamic State, responsible for war crimes including beheadings, has become a much more threatening force, and not just in the areas it controls in Iraq and Syria.America's drone strikes in Pakistan, Somalia and Yemen have been carried out as part of a global war on terror - with the justification that US citizens face imminent threat. This has been used as a reason for armed drone strikes on suspected militants in geographical areas where sending in troops is not an option.

Until now Britain hasn't used this idea of a broader "war" to justify drone attacks - and this is what is at the core of the current debate.International law expert Simon Behrman says the UK's Syria drone strike was "dodgy". "The key issue here is about the targeted killing of people outside of an armed conflict," he said."If the UK were engaged in an armed conflict in Syria and the target was an enemy combatant, then it would be legal. But as the UK is not, this does not apply."Human rights organisation Reprieve went further: "What we are seeing is the failed US model of secret strikes being copied wholesale by the British government."But Defence Secretary Michael Fallon insists the drone attack which killed the two men was a "perfectly legal act of self defence" because of the threat posed by Islamic State and Britons who join the group.He added that Britain "would not hesitate" in carrying out further secret drone attacks on suspected jihadis in Syria who pose a threat to citizens back home.